Which of the following is a common defense used in property crime cases?

Lack of intent is a fundamental defense in property crime cases because many property crimes, like theft or burglary, require proof of intent to commit the unlawful act. If a defendant can demonstrate that they did not have the intent to deprive the owner of their property or to commit an illegal act, it can negate the criminal liability. This might involve situations where the defendant believed they had the right to take the property or did not have the requisite mental state when the act occurred. Essentially, without the intention to commit a crime, the legal definition of the offense may not be satisfied, making this defense a powerful one in court.