Which of the following is NOT an example of larceny from a merchant?

The choice of paying for goods with counterfeit currency is correct in identifying an action that is not classified as larceny from a merchant. Larceny generally involves the unlawful taking of someone else's property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it.

In this scenario, using counterfeit currency involves deception and fraud rather than the straightforward theft of physical goods. When someone uses counterfeit money to pay, they are not stealing the merchandise in the traditional sense. Instead, they are engaging in a fraudulent act that misrepresents the value of the currency being exchanged. This act could lead to charges of fraud or counterfeiting but does not fall under the definition of larceny, which specifically requires the illegal taking of property without the owner's consent.

In contrast, taking property valued at more than $200, using an anti-shoplifting device to steal, and exchanging stolen property for cash all pertain directly to actions where there is an intent to unlawfully take or use someone else's property without permission, thus fitting the definition of larceny from a merchant.